• bjorney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Should we keep people from dying from lung cancer because they smoked? Should we not try to help people dying from liver disease because they’re alcoholics?

    When the smoker/drinker fully admits they have zero intention of quitting, I would much rather give my lung/liver to someone who isn’t going to get a full, healthy life out of it, rather than someone who clearly would rather continue abusing it and burn through it in a couple years.

    Organs are a limited resource, that’s why there is a list - and we should absolutely dedicate limited resources to doing as much good as possible

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah medical providers routinely do deny limited treatments (like organs) to people who refuse to stop taking drugs, smoking, or drinking. It makes complete sense too.

      In the US, no one forces anyone to get a vaccine. But if a patient doesn’t cooperate with the doctors’ orders, they won’t get the treatment.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even really denying. They are just giving that organ to someone else. I’m sure if there were a glut of organs on the market somehow, then they could get less picky, but you don’t. For every successful organ donation there are probably a dozen people who die waiting.