I apologize if this is old news, but I just noticed it. It looks like Kagi has added Fediverse Forums as a default Web search option.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Cool. Wish more search engines would do that.

    But, as far as Kagi goes, it’s a paid service and it’s an American company. So I won’t be using them.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          And then you write your own (wrong) answers below it in a different hand writing and pen. And call it SEO.

        • arotrios@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          That was you?

          Well then, in answer to your last question scrawled in the Kansas City Walmart bathroom, yes, you should definitely get that checked out by a medical professional.

            • _pete_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              They’re all based on others indexes to be honest so there isn’t really one.

              DuckDuckGo is Bing, Startpage is Google, Kagi is seemingly a mishmash of a bunch of search engines (including the Russian owned Yandex) Brave is independent but owned and run by assholes so that isn’t much better.

              Personally I like Kagi enough and it’s independent enough for me to pay for it.

              • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s the problem, really. They all have pros and cons.

                Kagi is American, so they are out for me. So is DuckDuckGo.

                I don’t care if startpage uses the Google index, since Google isn’t profiting from my data or from ads.

                Their servers are in the EU, and the balance between privacy and usable results is good enough.

                I see it like using a third-party front end for YouTube. All of the benefits with none of the risks or private data theft.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Search engine? I started rawdoging urls a while ago.

        The internet is increasingly more useless, the sites i really need are bookmarked anyway.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I started rawdoging urls a while ago.

          Works best when you’ve got a web ring or other friendly community of contributors to reference against one another.

          But those are few and fair between in the modern day.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Instead of bookmarks I use the “share to Standard Notes” option. It names the note after the link, saves the link, allows you to write a summary or tags, and makes it all searchable so it is findable later rather than disappearing like a needle in a haystack.

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not using Kagi because its an American company is valid. But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product. There is still a transaction with a free product.

      Kagi is not free because they respect your privacy and don’t sell your data.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I have donated €1500 to opensource software projects and paid a whopping €7 for software. These (privacy respecting) projects got my money because they weren’t transaction based. Capitalism is not the only way.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t use them or never read their privacy policy so i don’t know. But it’s not because it’s a paid service that company won’t use your data to sell it for more profit. That’s EXTRA profit for them, so why the hell not. And them being based in the US means I already can’t trust them with their poor privacy laws.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’d happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

        10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

        Like, that is way too much.

        I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          $10/m is unlimited searches though…

          And yeah, searches are actually quite expensive. There’s a LOT of infrastructure that goes into making something unique with your own search engine that isn’t just a wrapper over Google.

          The actual compute cost per search, in 2024, was $0.0125. Kagi states they want to keep Costa below $0.015 per search, but their search partners are a major expense.

          That ofc ignores all the supporting infra, devs, support…etc that goes into making it all possible.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The business model just doesn’t make sense then (using search partners).

            Because $60, let alone $120 US, a year is far more than most people would be willing to pay.

            Dunno what to say, it’s just more than most people can justify paying for the service.

            I’m gonna stick with DuckDuckGo and the newly free mullvad cached search

            • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              I mean, the business model works? They make money, they pay staff, and they are growing.

              I don’t know what you’re talking about, people have price sensitivity of course. You are projecting yours onto “everyone”, is it not a successful business?

              There’s a niche they cater to, if you are not that niche then you are not that niche. Doesn’t mean the niche doesn’t exist.

              • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Sure, but I’m still feeling like complaining that there isn’t a business that’s made affordable pay-to-search a thing. (That I know of)

                I’m not taking back that $120 USD/year for search is way more than most people would be willing to pay

                Though yeah, I suppose saying their business model isn’t working was hyperbolic, I must admit.

        • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe. They use several other indexes as their backend so they have to pay microsoft for every search

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There are plenty of paid products that do not respect your privacy and sell your data.

        And there’s free products that do respect your privacy and don’t make you the product. They are community products.

        For instance I offer my bandwidth and storage to thousands of strangers to share torrents and they do the same to me. No secondhand transactions happening.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product.

        That’s definitely one model for operating a public service, but its far from the only one.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        lets see if federation can keep the hawks away. they will certainly be trying (again) once we hit critical mass.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using Kagi for about a month now, and I think I’m gonna stick with it. Paying with dollars instead of data/attention feels more healthy for everyone involved.

    (Fully realizing, of course, that there’s nothing stopping them from doing both, and that’s why we need better laws. Voting with your wallet will never be a complete solution… but it is something I can do right now.)

  • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using Kagi for the last year+.

    Personally, I wish they’d tone down the AI stuff that ruined Google, but at least you can turn most of it off.

    Their results are okay, a little better than Bing, but obviously they’re limited by their existing index providers, I wish they’d run their own spiders and crawl for their own data, since I think Bing fails on a lot of coverage of obscure websites.

    In general I find the weighting of modern indexes to be subpar, though the SEO industry has made it a hard problem to tackle, I wish more small websites and forums were higher ranked, and AI slop significantly de rated.

    TW: Self harm

    Also not a huge fan of the company and a lot of it’s ardent customers, who heavily protested a suicide prevention popup if you used it to searched for how to kill yourself.

    • targetx@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Have you tried the small web lens? They run their own index specifically to help surface the content you mention is hard to find by default.

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Small web always returns 0 results for anything that isn’t extremely broad, unfortunately.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Kagi has multiple indexes of their own

      And the AI stuff is all opt on from what I can tell. I’ve never gotten any AI thing except when I asked for it

      • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        They have smallweb and news indexing, but other than that AFAICT they rely completely on other providers. Which is a shame, Google allows submitting sites for indexing and notifies if they can’t.

        Running a scraper doesn’t need to cover everything since they have access to other indexes, but they really should be developing that ability instead of relying on Bing and other providers to provide good results, or results at all.

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Running an index is quite a massive endeavor at the scale of Google. They’re a small team.

          I think it makes sense considering there’s a competitive market of indexes already. They make small ones to cover some niches and use existing ones for the rest.

          Keep in mind they also add their own reranking and stuff on top of Bing Google whatever

          • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            If they were a small or free service I wouldn’t have much issue, but they do charge, I don’t think it’s too much to ask that they at least attempt to scrape the wider web.

            Building their own database seems the prudent thing long-term, I don’t doubt they could shore up coverage over Bing. They don’t have to replace the other indexes wholesale, just supplement it.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I encourage subscribers to go make themselves heard on this post if you support being able to disable particular indexes such as Yandex.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re definitely stretching themselves too thin, but as long as I get better and more relevant, cleaner, no advertising search results for my knowledge work and research. With my privacy in tact.

      Then I’m continuing to pay them for a product I find to be superior than the alternatives.

    • clove@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh, doesn’t discouraged me from using em. For me is them or Google. As those are the only two useable engines for my type of surfing.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Every single time with red comes up there’s always this FUD. You, specifically, don’t miss any opportunity to make mention of this. Across Lemmy, which is rather suspicious. Helping the Russian war effort? That’s a pretty big leap here.

      Why?

      Imagine a search engine aggregator aggregating search engine results from multiple sources for aggregation. The more indexes they support the better the results are going to be for everyone, I don’t see this as a problem for data aggregation.

      Why should data aggregation give any sort of shits about geopolitics?

      Regardless, the topic of this post, fediverse search, is part of their own search engine anyways afaik

      • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I have been sick a lot lately, so have had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t have a search for Kagi or something. I wanted to use Kagi though, so I was disappointed when I realized that they want to continue this practice.

        What are you implying with it being suspicious? In what way?

        If Kagi pays a Russian company for a service, that company pays taxes to the Russian government.

        Russia spends 32% of its budget on the Russian military. So for every dollar they get in taxes, one third is spent on the Russian military.

        With a corporate tax rate of 20% that means 6.4% of Yandex profits go to the military. Since Kagi is mainly a paid service, I don’t want my money to go to the Russian military, and I guess a lot of other people don’t want this either.

        https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hikes-national-defence-spending-by-23-2025-2024-09-30/

        The Russian people are not to blame, and I am sure a lot of great people work at Yandex and at different companies in Russia. That said, Russia chose to attack a peaceful democratic country, they are currently sanctioned by a lot of western countries in hopes that it will pressure their economy enough to force them to stop the war.

        There isn’t much we can do to stop the conflict besides hurting them economically and supporting Ukraine. If we continue to use Russian products and services then that does not work. Unfortunately this affects everyone in Russia.

    • Aido@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Kagi lets you prioritize/demote/block per-domain but that’s a separate feature