• sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trans Mountain ballooned from a $6 billion project to a $30 billion project after it was bought by the feds.

    I have no idea what would have happened if it had been built by a private entity, but I suspect the developers would have run out of money at some point. Currently, it sounds like there’s a pretty good chance taxpayers will pick up the bill.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that’s a very good example. Wasn’t this project started way before the feds acquired it?

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s sort of the point: the private entity that started Trans Mountain had to bail because they ran out of money and investors. Governments have much deeper pockets, and are motivated to complete projects regardless of the cost.

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok so that’s a pretty bad example then.

          I can see that there could be conflicts of interests, but at the same time if the country engages itself in objectives to reduce greenhouse gasses and find alternatives, then they have to actually do it. Companies don’t.

          We should look at other countries like Norway to see how it’s going on there.

          • Someone@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, Norway is one of the world’s top oil producers, but also the leader in EV adoption by far.