• frostbiker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any early retiree is most likely a billionaire

    My kid’s teacher retired at 55. So you think she was a billionaire?

    so by definition they weren’t even contributing that much to begin with, probably just hoarding generational riches.

    So rich people don’t contribute to society because they don’t have to work in order to live. However, people under a UBI will be very productive because they don’t have to work in order to live?

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not engaging anymore, you don’t want to learn, you’re just constructing weird gotchas for outrage.

    • DoomsdaySprocket@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arguably, under a UBI system people will not be pressured into jobs they aren’t good at or hate just because those jobs offer the wage they need to live. Demographically, “female-coded” jobs are undervalued, so I can see how a UBI would help level the playing field there especially.

      I can think of many times I’ve wondered why the hell a coworker is doing this job when they suck at it and seem to hate it. I’d love for those people to have the option to just get out without potentially parking themselves and their family at the food bank.

      • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Arguably, under a UBI system people will not be pressured into jobs they aren’t good at or hate just because those jobs offer the wage they need to live

        Yep, I’ve been in that situation. It seems reasonable to imagine that with a UBI some of those people would quit their job. Now, with fewer people working, how do you pay for UBI and everything else? We already have a deficit and inflation.