cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/5064944

Let’s say a site like the New York Times supports ActivityPub, so you can comment e.g. from Mastodon on an article but also from the article’s page on nytimes.com, where all comments are displayed.

Is this article/nytimes.com part of the Fediverse? Yes and no. It should be but if we speak about the Fediverse we mostly mean social networks like Mastodon and Lemmy.

I think the reality is and will be slightly more complicated. I think we should think of the Fediverse as being a part of the web, be it a traditional website or a social network. That’s why I propose a new term: the fungal web, based on how mushrooms act as a dezentral connector over which plants communicate.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    Is this article/nytimes.com part of the Fediverse? Yes

    FTFY. Problem solved.

    if we speak about the Fediverse we mostly mean social networks like Mastodon and Lemmy.

    I don’t know who this “we” is but I don’t. The Wikipedia article has a couple of good diagrams showing what most people consider to be the Fediverse - sure it includes the big dogs like Lemmy and Mastodon but it includes Wordpress and Diaspora (still need to dig out my old Diaspora account).