New research suggests more newcomers to Canada have chosen to leave in recent years, a threat to a country that relies on immigration to drive population and economic growth.

The rate of immigrants leaving the country, or onward migration, has been steadily increasing since the 1980s and is rising among recent cohorts, suggesting newcomers “may not be seeing the benefits of moving to Canada,” according to a study on immigrant retention by the Institute for Canadian Citizenship and the Conference Board of Canada.

The report, published Tuesday, underscored the risks of Canada failing to meet expectations of newcomers, who are facing worsening housing affordability, a strained health-care system and underemployment, among other issues. It also highlighted how disillusionment among immigrants can slow down progress even in a country that consistently sets fresh records for population gains.

“It’s a reflection on our broader society and more intractable failings that we have. If immigrants are saying ‘no, thanks’ and moving on, that’s a real existential threat to Canada’s prosperity,” Daniel Bernhard, chief executive officer of the Institute for Canadian Citizenship, a pro-immigration advocacy group, said in an interview. “We need to wake up and recognize that if we don’t deliver, people will leave. And if they leave, we’re in trouble.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has been using immigration to rapidly add more workers to stave off economic decline from an aging populace. But record population growth in recent years has led to growing criticism that its policies have exacerbated existing housing shortages and added more pressure on infrastructure and services like health care.

The report showed spikes in the annual rates of immigrants leaving Canada in 2017 and 2019, reaching 20-year highs of 1.1 per cent and 1.18 per cent, respectively. That’s compared to the average of 0.9 per cent of people who were granted permanent residence after 1982 who leave Canada each year. While the numbers may not sound significant, they add up over time and can lead to attrition of 20 per cent or more of an arrival cohort over 25 years.

Earlier this week, a survey by Environics Institute showed waning public support for high levels of immigration due to concerns of housing affordability and availability. That dwindling support, combined with growing dissatisfaction among newcomers, will be a fresh challenge for a government that’s trying to placate an outcry over an affordability crisis while competing in a global race for skilled workers.

The lack of enthusiasm for staying in Canada, which led to onward migration by some newcomers, is also behind a sharp drop in immigrants choosing to become Canadians, according to Bernhard. The proportion of permanent residents who took up citizenship within 10 years of arrival dropped by 40 per cent between 2001 and 2021.

“If Canada can’t reverse these issues and can’t provide these vital services and affordability, immigrants will leave,” Bernhard said. “We need to be working harder to make sure that they’re happy here, so that they contribute here, become Canadians and contribute to our shared success. We need to realize that on balance, immigrants may owe Canada less than Canada owes immigrants.”

    • ultratiem@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      EU. I’ve been scouting some Nordic countries and I would double my salary and my rent would drop about %30. All where you’re not worked to death, eat real food and get better health care for free because you’re a human. Some of them give 2 month vacations base (Italy).

      Here, I’m working to death so my boss can stack another million to his bank account next year. And I get less than 10% of that. Gonna tap out.

      • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What field do you work in if you don’t mind me asking?

        I’ve heard that EU countries have better quality of life, but poorer wages/higher taxes.

        • ultratiem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Technical artist in gaming.

          I mean it all depends where. I was looking specifically at places with higher pay and lower rent/mortgages. Out of the 12ish, 3 stood out (I think Sweden, Finland, and I can’t recall the third but I was surprised that Norway wasn’t it) to be a huge boost for me just financially.

          Quality of life, so health care and how you are generally treated at work was also high on the list. Through my research, I was surprised that Austria had great support for its citizens especially when it came to housing and built most of its apartment units with grocery stores and gyms and daycares for families.

          I have an EU visa so for me, I would sorta just be going home.

          All I can say is that all the dat I saw, NA was near the bottom for a first world nation when it came to wages, treatment and benefits of any kind. The only thing we lead in is consumption of everything.

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know it’s pedantic but can we stop calling it “free healthcare”? It’s not free. We pay for it with our taxes. It’s universal healthcare.

        • ultratiem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well the US pays taxes too and that shit isn’t free there. Soooo…

          • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not free anywhere, that’s the point. It’s socialized healthcare or universal healthcare that is the good stuff.