According to Anders Åslund, a former Atlantic Council senior fellow, Sullivan has advised Zelenskiy not to try to recapture Crimea or to strike the Kerch Bridge that connects the occupied peninsula with Russian territory. Sullivan’s apparent reasoning is that this may spark a nuclear war.

Like an idiot saying: Let’s not poke the bear, better to just give them what they want. Also it’s Russian rhetoric.

Kyiv, however, does not agree and frequently targets Crimea.

Go Ukraine, giving in to a bully only encourages it.

Not a very interesting site:

Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site.
We can’t connect to the server at fedster.uk.

But… but there were no ads! How did people know what to buy?

Fuck yes, good relevant sites to the subject of your interest, created b y people who actually know about it, because they are genuinely interested.

I don’t know what to say, you are right, and I hate you for it.

Nah it’s about as bad as it’s been for the past 2 decades, when the Internet became commercial.
In the 90’s Internet was driven by enthusiasts, who actually cared about the subject of their sites. Today the noise from commercial interests dominate almost completely.
I’d sacrifice Google and YouTube in a heart beat, and go back to Alta vista even web crawler as my main search engine, if it meant we could get the quality internet experience we had in the 90’s.

Yes, that part was a bit confusing to me at first, since they already described zero tolerance against anything not adhering to official guidelines Dost Test, which is new to me.

But it makes perfect sense now, they only follow those rules strictly because they must. They would probably love if they could break them if they thought they could get away with it.

When I was shown a link to what they call “MAP”, it very quickly became crystal clear what it was about.

Thank you. 😀 This mistake was a really bad one. I do NOT support pedophilia, but it may have looked like it. So better to admit fault.

But I also believe truth is more important than ego.

Thank you. 😀

I apologize, I thought I did, I read the rules, and I read on the frontpage, and it seemed pretty harmless.

And there were no posts here that showed anything actually wrong, but mostly what seemed like knee jerk reactions to the accusation.

Had I dug one step deeper, I would have found it. But my diligence wasn’t diligent enough, and I wrongfully concluded it was an anti LGBT issue.

Turns out I was mistaken, and yes I was a bit slow to figure that out.

I agree, you can’t decide an urge, but you can decide how you act on it.

Yes I see that now.

I initially thought this was an LGBT witch hunt. But unfortunately I have been shown that there actually is promotion of pedophilia there.

https://rqd2.net/c/map

Thank you, it didn’t look so bad on the front page, but I can see what you mean now. There are several posts that try to normalize pedophilia.

OK, that’s disgusting, but I can’t verify an image. There is not even a hint of the source.

deleted by creator

rqd2.net rule 3:

Nothing illegal under US (specifically Nevada) or local law. You know what that includes. (In case you don’t know what that includes, I mean child pornography [anything that fails the Dost Test], sexually interacting with minors, etc.) We have a zero tolerance policy for anything that fails the Dost test. Anything violating it will result in an immediate ban and removal of images. No admitting to anything that could cause the server to go under investigation, such as looking at child porn.

Unfortunately I have been shown that there is promotion of pedophilia on that site. Although there may not be actually illegal content.

https://rqd2.net/c/map

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator