Previously they required a subpoena, now they require a court order. So what was the lie?
Previously they required a subpoena, now they require a court order. So what was the lie?
And I’m pretty disappointed that in a discussion as serious about something as the loneliness epidemic that is blighting so many lives, someone tries to side track it onto their own, and quite separate pet subject. But you do you.
Mental health is a profoundly important and covers a diverse set of widely differing conditions can’t believe that you are shutting down a conversation about schizophrenia because it doesn’t immediately conform to your narrow idea of what the so-called ‘topic’ of the conversation is. Horrific.
But if we acknowledge agoraphobia, why are we gratuitously ignoring schizophrenia?
Yes. But ‘what about agoraphobia?’ Isn’t particularly helpful when a group of people are trying to talk about claustrophobia
You might havwe well posted “Some people don’t like cheese”. It’s not relevant to this article
I don’t have a particular problem with instances deciding that they want to fund themselves through advertising. When the Fediverse was developing, one of my predictions was that instances would come up with multiple different ways to fund each other including donations, subscriptions and advertising.
Do you never e-mail people with gmail or yahoo addresses?
I did actually click through to the original community to
I’m on kbin.social but subscribe to unitedkingdom on Feddit - look like it is workinhg OK at the moment
That’s a claim. You haven’t given any tangible evidence that it’s a lie, you just talk in handywavy generalities
So rather that talking in generalities what specific lies have they told about respect for privacy?
Hang on - what exactly did they lie about?
Same with kbin users
But what should they specifically do in this case to improve the situation - got any actual suggestions?
So. What do you suggest they in practice?
Because?
I was getting more bearded Jon Hamm
I apologise for the trauma caused.
From the orginal linked reporting, it appears that previously Apple would accept a subpoena subpoena issued by police departments and law enforcement agencies with no judicial oversight. Under the new policy there has to be a court order or a search warrant, both of which have to be approved by a judge.
This feels like a tightening to me. https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/13/apple-push-notifications-government-warrant/