Yeah, this isn’t like the hotel thinks its food is unsafe to eat, this is just acknowledging that the customer wanted their beef cooked below safe standards.

Isn’t this usually covered by a disclaimer on the menu though?

“They do it for free!”

Not anymore, fucko. Have fun selling your ungovernable site.

Throw it on the pile of solutions we’ll never have because the treatment is more profitable than the cure.

Fucking me over here thinking this is the setup for a joke.

I definitely thought they were talking about Amazon the company and not The Amazon.

I mean, that is effectively what’s happening to workers now, in a sense - worker wages have stagnated to the point that they are receiving much less of a share of overall profit than they were in the 70s and 80s, while executive compensation has skyrocketed.

The reason executives can’t do what you’re suggesting is because workers are already just scraping by. The wages as they are now are unlivable, if they’re reduced any more, people will walk off in droves. I suspect if by some miracle it passed through both houses and the executive desk without a billionaire yanking it, and land were taxed to hell and back, they’d probably just eat it because it would still be more profitable than letting it sit fallow.

It is very clear to anyone who has flown with Air Canada that they view their customers at an inconvenience.

I mean, really, that’s true of almost any airline.

I still can’t believe he thought it was a good idea to hold a poll asking users if he should be involved with the platform. Imagine spending $44 billion to be told to fuck off.