I lost some, I won some.

  • 0 Posts
  • 129 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle



  • CN says recent regulatory changes have made it harder to find crews and necessitated a “modernization of the compensation model.”

    CPKC says it has been negotiating in good faith since September and offered compensation boosts and more schedule predictability, but that the railway and the union “remain far apart on the issues.”

    Any industry people around to confirm if these claims are as BS as they sound? CN taking breaks away is self-explanatory I guess, but I get the feeling CPKC’s “predictability” of shift scheduling with “compensation boosts” means more hours and/or regular overtime. Obviously they could hire more people if the job was made more attractive, but I highly doubt they want more people. I expect they just want to squeeze more out of fewer people, as usual.



  • Yikes, that’s disappointing. If the tracks are beat up by freight trains though, doesn’t that also affect the luxury riders / tourists? I guess there must be soundproofing for them?

    Trains I was on in other countries (crowded or not, higher price tiers and lower) were always smooth and quiet rides at the least. Also, I only saw crowded trains a few times, so in most cases they were quite comfy as well.





  • OK, sure. I appreciate that explanation but I wasn’t unsure about how ways the Flipper Zero or devices like it might be used (just as I’m aware there are reasons for and against the existence of backdoors in software). Based on your response, did you think I was in favour of banning it? I never intended any value judgments about how it might be used, but perhaps some people are reading into my use of the term “exploit” even though it’s not always a negative term.

    I added the edit above because I was trying to figure out the intended meaning of the comment I was replying to, since it didn’t make sense to me. Probably it’s just awkwardly worded and that threw me off, since it doesn’t make sense otherwise.





  • Thanks for the article. Private business models have no place in our healthcare of course, but this is actually the tip of the iceberg. I find it disturbing how easily the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater because if profit-seekers can’t have the business model they want, apparently we’re to assume nothing else can be done and the whole concept of a virtual service must be scrapped.

    I wish the focus for media stories about shitty implementations of tech was to highlight the very large gap we are seeing between how tech can and should help the public (especially those who could use increased accessibility), and how it is instead being used by all forms of private industry to manipulate markets and control people. Instead it’s a shoulder shrug and people keep getting progressively trained to believe any and all innovation has to benefit shareholders first, and everyone else last (if at all).