The reason that’s never going to happen is because it would be the cause of massive profit losses for digital companies.
Capitalism makes the rules.
The reason that’s never going to happen is because it would be the cause of massive profit losses for digital companies.
Capitalism makes the rules.
Normally I’d agree with you, but… 6 day old account? Isn’t that a little like pulling up the ladder?
People on reddit genuinely don’t know because the L word gets the ban hammer there
No ads whatsoever on voyager. Maybe give that a shot?
On the one hand, I can see why they might complain. Their “projected” losses from piracy probably top 6 or 7 digits. The problem with that logic, of course, is the assumption that people will buy the ppv if the streams aren’t available. The guy I know who bounces between streams during a fight always says it’ll be a cold day in hell before he pays for the extortion rates the ufc imposes.
But the solution to their problem is definitely not forcing isps to respond instantaneously to dcma requests. I don’t even think anyone will take that demand seriously.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
A black market would arise. Finished with your show? Get your money back. NFTs aren’t connected to identity like that.
They could never pull a stunt like what they’re doing now and make people rebuy things.
Advertising opportunity would essentially fall to zero. Ever notice how ads play before and after streaming services nowadays?
A subscription model wouldn’t work under this system. Subscriptions pull in a higher net than single selling products.
The current system would be overturned in its entirety by something like this, and that’s why the people making money and holding the rights aren’t going to let it happen.