It adheres to the philosophy of “the computer should do what I tell it to”. Maybe there is no reason to do it, but it doesn’t matter, the computer shouldn’t stop me from doing something if I really want to.
she/they
It adheres to the philosophy of “the computer should do what I tell it to”. Maybe there is no reason to do it, but it doesn’t matter, the computer shouldn’t stop me from doing something if I really want to.
The price of housing that my eyes see from text in the visible spectrum doesn’t agree. Or the lack of water during intense heatwaves. Or the lack of snow in winter.
Sure, but that was more than a decade later. People had time to grow up from pre-teens to voting adults during that time.
???
What lmao
…how does that apply to labels
How would warnings stop you from that? It’s informative text, it can’t hurt you. Not any more than the alcohol itself.
Artificial sweeteners are very safe and sugar is carbohydrates, which you almost need for energy and a healthy diet. Coffee and butter is also quite safe.
But alcohol and tobacco? Any amount is harmful. Warnings wouldn’t be unreasonable for people to make more informed decisions. You’d be surprised at how many think alcohol is harmless. And its stuff you quite literally don’t need to live.
Even if it’s useless it’s a massive step forwards in superconductor development
Especially since mars is 1/3 of earth’s gravity
Driving a car would probably suck and be slow