How is it different? You’re basically saying that all social media is untrustworthy and so therefore it’s ridiculous to not trust any of it. There’s no logic there.

That… doesn’t make any sense.

Every rabid beast is “dangerous”. So, yes, it’s unreasonable to say you should assume that if you run into one it will attack you.

That’s what you sound like.

I don’t see what’s unreasonable about saying that you shouldn’t take the things you read on algorithmic social media sites as representative of any population at large. That it’s not a “genuine” representation of any population.