
Tariff? Simply ban their import.
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412
Tariff? Simply ban their import.
What was the result of the announcement to rescind Musk’s Canadian citizenship? I saw the first stories about it, but nothing since, I’d say that successfully removing the legal citizenship of someone directly and ardently working counter to Canada’s national interests should count as sanction, no?
I wonder if they’ll be throwing people out of helicopters over Superior or James Bay?
Bingo. If anything, use of a burner phone will be purposely misconstrued as “suspicious”, and used as justification for more thorough screening.
“You just got it last week? That’s weird, we usually only hear drug smugglers using new phones. You’re not smuggling fentanyl, are you? OK, so you won’t mind if I take a look through your luggage to be sure, right? Maybe I should send you to secondary screening for an x-ray.”
I have to be honest, I’d be happy just to have one who didn’t remind me of Milhouse.
This is true, which I’d assumed was the reason that I heard talk of limits to its scope, specifically concerning sedition or actions which ran counter to the national interest/security. Bit of a Pandora’s Box though, absolutely.