Ah yes, the ol’ “we shouldn’t try to control access to something because there’s illegal methods to avoid it.” Why even bother requiring ID for gun/alcohol/tobacco sales when you can just get someone else to buy them for you?
What a silly argument.
And they would be wrong.
That’s exactly what I took from reading the original article. You’d have to want to see something else in order to see it some other way, or be an incompetent reader.
Time to boycott poutine then.
She probably thinks the Native Americans are thankful that they now have all those nice reservations to live on as well, compared to the conditions they had before the Europeans came.
I’m well aware of that, I’m referring to the original poster’s thought thread.
the Government of Canada should consider introducing a windfall profits tax on large, price-setting corporations to disincentivize excess hikes in their profit margins for these items
Right, but it’s broader than just targeting 3 large grocery chains. AFAIK there’s no current law that allows the Government to tax an individual at a rate that isn’t on the books, and something like this is still years away (it’s just a recommendation after a year of study for starters).
It doesn’t help anyone struggling to put food on the table in the short term sadly, but hey let’s all just blast off into stupid land and suggest taxing them is the easy answer that will solve all of our problems. This isn’t Facebook, and the original poster’s suggestion was fucking retarded.
And we see what happens with every other law that tries something similar. The law spends months or years in deliberation, and eventually when it passes it’s not clear enough of what a ‘grocer’ is, or whether individually owned franchises count, etc.
That’s why none of this shit ever amounts to anything but noise.
The gov’t can request info from the CRA on profits the big grocers make, compare them to pre-pandemic numbers and adjust their tax rate.
You can’t adjust the tax rates of INDIVIDUAL companies.
He should tax the fuck out of them
Ok, but realistically now, how would you even do that. What would be the law you’d implement to allow you to do that? That’s not how taxes work at all.
Look at all the downvotes… a simple google search would tell you it’s true.
You don’t need to go all the way to Somalia though, the Somalian gangs are already here trafficking drugs.
Seriously. It was like, “yes, YES, wait what, hmm, absolutely, again what, uhh, wait but you said, well yeah”.
You’re wrong.
All the wrinkles on his brain that provided surface area for memories and critical thinking have leaked out. Now he has wrinkly ears, and a smooth brain.
Haven’t nut allergies climbed over the years as well? PB was never banned when I was in school.
The bigger waste of time is why this is even news. Restaurants are regulated, you can’t just ignore them and only focus on the bigger picture. That’s like some guy getting pulled over for doing 50 in a 35 and complaining the cops should be catching ‘real criminals’ instead.
Of course, and what’s the culture tied to English speakers then? Do you think 2nd and 4rd generation Canadian Italians/Ukranians/wherever, who don’t speak their native language, have lost all sense of their culture? Are the 2nd and 3rd generation anglophones living in Quebec incapable of adopting any of Quebecs culture?
Get over yourself.
Just curious, if Mandarin suddenly became the new lingua franca overnight, and your province’s Mandarin-speaking population was growing constantly, would you just throw English away and learn Mandarin?
Over several generations? Absolutely.
I’m sure they do, they may not understand the technical details, but I’m not sure why you think people who make rules or pass laws would think the rules or laws won’t be broken or circumvented. It’s a law, not some magical contract. If your parents say “no Xbox until you’ve finished your homework”, they’re not amazed when they find you on the Xbox 20 minutes later, homework unfinished.
It’s been illegal to sell alcohol and porn to minors for decades now, do you think before the internet and VHS it was impossible for kids to find? Do you think the lawmakers back then were somehow baffled that the law they put in place, didn’t 100% prevent children from drinking and stiffening their socks?