The browser had a built-in RSS button that would display in the browser location bar when any website you’re on had an RSS feed available. Clicking the button would then take you to the RSS feed for that web page
How would this work? Do websites with rss feeds normally publish the url to that feed in some standard place? Are there any third party extensions that do it?
If you set up qbittorrent with the built-in search you can torrent stuff without ever opening your browser
OP has preempted your comment by specifying “TOS-breaking” tho
cute character
The chicken uprising will happen, only a matter of time
I thought they cancelled manifest v3 after the backlash?
What’s extra confusing is that I’ve seen people asking about how to get this information from the API, with the answer being that you can’t (I guess to protect privacy?). It’s only accessible to federated servers, but then those can do what they want with it including publishing it to everyone.
I remember a little while ago a thread with someone from kbin gloating that they could see what everyone was voting, and accusing the people upvoting comments they disagreed with of being bigots in a vaguely threatening way obviously intended to produce a chilling effect, and people found this surprising because that information is not public on most instances.
I basically agree with the people saying open info is just the nature of posting on a public forum and of federation, but there could be improvements, even just in awareness of what is and isn’t private.
If enough people pirate, there will be popular support for reforming copyright, so eventually there’s less crackdown
Hope it goes up more
This is more of an argument against EM than free speech absolutism, since your point is that he doesn’t actually believe in it. But anyway it seems like there should be some possible middle ground between a truly absolutist position on free speech, and the overt disdain for free speech implied by a vague prohibition like the OP law. Isn’t it valuable for people to generally be able to speak their minds? That can be the case even if the loudest people hiding behind the idea are disingenuous, or if the furthest interpretations of it go too far.
Is there a community for criticisms of moderation? I’d subscribe to that
The feature only lets you filter posts, not users from that instance.
Outlining the need for the research, the authors suggested that better DNA sequencing could help the police identify suspects in cases. “A clear knowledge of the genetic variation is important for understanding the origin and demographic history of the ethnicity of the populations in Xinjiang … [which] may offer an investigative lead for the police.”
Actually worse than I was expecting from the headline
Fucking authoritarians ruin everything
Not really, you’re saying if people you dislike are associated with something then you automatically write it off without understanding it. That’s self mockery.
But no matter how you do it the metrics they mentioned will still go down. Property values will go down because reducing property values and making housing affordable is pretty much equivalent.
Honestly I have much less of a problem with some degree of inaccurate info than wasting my time by not immediately geting to the point in concisely giving me the bit of syntax I was searching for to begin with. That’s what they’ve always got right that other sources were getting wrong.
Tech geeks and nerds (no offense, I’m one too) tend to be the first people to populate any sort of new online social network.
Seems more likely to be political extremists, tech nerds is a lucky outcome IMO
That’s perfect since I use FF anyway, thanks