This is Chad. Chad downloaded the movie from a pirate site, then smoked a joint and got a blowjob. Don’t be like Chad.

Oh yeah, and we changed the movie too.

I rented a car to do Uber with while I apply for jobs, and the car is an electric. They had no gas powered cars available.

It is such a pain in the ass. I’ve only had it for a couple of days, but so far I’ve spent 2.5 hours today waiting for charge, and about 5 hours driving passengers.

I’m ready. I want to download a car. Just need someone to point me in the right direction.

Is this what people were referring to as “zines”?

Just in case anyone’s not aware, don’t make a bonfire this big in a forest

And no, I have no problem with you disliking my method of commenting. If that’s where you stopped it would be no problem. But your response to people saying things you don’t like is to start a crusade to eject those people from your world.

That is why you are worth the effort of opposing.

You’re doing a fine job of discrediting yourself. All I have to do is show people what you said.

I don’t know what a person “coming up with the same sentence as an llm” would have anything to do with this unless the LLM detection is based on direct string comparison.

The use of bots is inherently deceptive

Nope. I can say:

Here’s what GPT-4 generated when I gave it that prompt: “[some LLM output that would get them banned by the machine we’re proposing to build]”

That is not deceptive. But it would be detected by this system and result in them being banned. Because you guys are gung-ho to build a powerful head-cracking machine and didn’t think of an obvious edge case.

Here’s the thread. The readers here can judge for themselves how much abuse haui_lemmy was receiving: https://lemmy.world/comment/7230392

Just so everyone is aware, this is the thread OP interpreted as so abusive it would warrant banning this person across multiple instances.

In this thread, you’ll notice that another user dares to disagree with haui_lemmy. haui_lemmy interprets that as trolling, and goes on a crusade to purge the entire lemmyverse of dissent.

I engaged you over multiple threads specifically because I am interested in your opinions.

No. Sincere use of a rhetorical question to make a point. While also leaving the door open, via format, that you might actually be telling you the truth. I purposefully leave both those avenues open because I don’t try to control the direction a conversation will go.

You can check if text is ai/llm generated and an automated api check before posting and immediate ban if found

If this LLM-detection function ever results in false positives, this system will be banning innocent people.

Also there are many, many cases where a person openly displays results from an LLM, without it being in any way antisocial.

Okay here. Since you want to mark me as a troll now, I’m just gonna stop being polite about how I do this. Because the polite way Om trying to do this is coming across to you as inauthentic, and the inauthenticity is coming across as trolling, and now you’re talking about applying this proposed mega ban hammer to me.

I don’t believe that you’re capable of seeing this clearly, and I won’t believe it until I you have linked to at least ten comments, in other threads, that you think represent this particular type of toxicity you’re complaining about.

What you’re talking about is banning people across many instances at once. Please don’t do that to me.

The question is definitely meant to highlight that I think you may be exaggerating, but in that purpose it is sincere.

You mentioned them calling something buying and selling. Did they also insult and manipulate you?

So these trolls’ tactic is to disagree with you about semantics?

Do you have evidence of this? Same users showing up at the same times, that sort of thing?

Bots are probably increasing in number. Even without improvements in technology, people’s adeptness at using robots will continue to increase.