There absolutely IS a way to do secure sharing of necessary credentials on demand with the user controlling the data.

It’s possible. Maybe we ought to make good systems instead of just fight bad ones?

What I am saying is eventually we’ll need to have a better age verification process than that.

I don’t want to provide my full identity, it would be cool for a zero trust information exchange. This sort of thing is being worked out already with OIDC. Allow the site access to ONLY the information it needs, in that instance age.

I am saying eventually we will have to get there, I don’t have to agree with it and neither do you. But it’s happening.

I don’t mean to argue in favor of what is being done here, I’m saying at some point we will need a better system and these things will have to happen and fighting AGAINST them is probably less beneficial than fighting for the system to be done properly.

These current events are a good place for us to highlight how dumb it’s being done.

At the same time determining how to regulate goods on a digital marketplace is important to figure out.

Your points are all valid but eventually we’ll need to figure out proper age verification and identification for some things.

Idk if porn is where it needs to start but just because it’s hard and not easy doesn’t mean it will stop.

Regulation invariably always brings “black markets” but it doesn’t mean it’s bad on that alone.

Is there a “user reviews” community?

Yeah.

Chechen war videos were not fun to get when you were looking for porn as a teenager.

Yo always check out your library first before piracy, if you can get it free and traffic your library you ought to

(Just cuz libraries are dope)

^ this

I find myself commenting on “older” posts fairly frequently, I’m not actually upset at there being “less” content.

This place feels like Reddit did 15 years ago.

I’m kinda drunk given its New Year’s Eve but I am 99% sure I could find and implement a QR code based authentication method in short order if I tried.

Plex does it, everyone else does it, in this day and age there’s no reason why you can’t generate a token and then a uri and then a QR code if you are able to handle the rest of it.

Again, how is it on Apple or any vendor for that matter, to be on the hook for them?

if they really wanted they could use Apple based oauth

For arbitrary text input id ask you to point at any other remote / UI that handles this limitation better.

Yeah but again that is on the app creator not the Apple TV.

Apple implementing a really nice keyboard using your phone to work around the app developer being lazy should be considered a bonus not a “well why didn’t they do this other thing” which is what I’m saying.

This is so wrong it is unhinged.

AppleTV+ is a subscription service to Apple content.

It’s a separate app, you don’t even need to have it installed.

You’re saying this new app and service they added, which don’t change the interface at all, has somehow ruined the interface?

What does the changed remote have to do with anything?

The center of the directional pad works like the old panel remote and they added the circle everyone complained about them removing.

And wtf does the butterfly keyboard have to do with the remote?

How did it change when they launched appletv+?

Which remote is better?

99% of apps on Apple TV have the same kind of login option.

If they don’t, it’s on the app developer to implement.

Maybe you ought to take the stance of not talking about something you’re unfamiliar with. Every thing you’ve pointed at has been wrong.

You’re not a fan of Apple, that’s your stance, you’ve made it clear, just stop there.

You keep saying stuff and it keeps getting worse….

https://imgur.com/a/5F4X6ew

It does have voice input.

Super sad all around.

Don’t be a contrarian for a second and think of the why yourself, it’s easy and good for your brain!

Bear just out there doing real life bear shit.

Poor thing

Not to mention the enemy with their exceptionally efficient pspspspspfire