That’s assuming Republicans have a moral compass or consistent ideological positions. That’s not the case though. It’s all just about what benefits them and their donors.
That’s assuming Republicans have a moral compass or consistent ideological positions. That’s not the case though. It’s all just about what benefits them and their donors.
The people of the US have the choice to not only elect their parliaments, but also the president. They also elect DAs and Sheriffs in many places. The people of the US have more democratic rights than most other people in countries considered democracies.
The fact that they’re having more elections does not mean they have ‘more democratic rights’.
I for example fail to see the point of the US mid-term elections. It doesn’t make the US system more democratic, just more complex.
Ugh, crediting Reagan with the liberation of the Eastern Bloc like that is hugely disrespectful to the people from those countries who put themselves on the line to fight for freedom - including Solidarność in Poland itself. Reagan didn’t have that much to do with it, especially his ‘famous’ speech which didn’t really have much of an impact at all at the time.
10 and 20 are somewhat contradictory.
Every far right party ever, in any given country, has claimed and still claims that the asylum system of the respective country is ‘broken’. That doesn’t make it actually true. But in the history of right wing parties, the foreigner, the immigrant, the ‘other’ has always been the prime scapegoat, for any problem they could possibly conjure up.
Just after the German reunification, neonazis started violent attacks that targeted immigrants and asylum seekers. This violence has not stopped. Neonazis are responsible for a major part of politically motivated violence too.
But political parties like the AfD know the score. They formulate their programs in a way that makes it hard to find grounds for outright bans. To say that their program has to give grounds for a ban is short-sighted - that will never happen. They need to be judged by the things they say outside of their programs, and by the actions they commit and inspire.
I would have said something like that about five years ago.
Since then, the AFD and its leaders have shown us their true colours, and especially with the recent fantasizing over mass deportations and other stuff, it’s crystal clear what they are: fascists. No sheep’s clothing involved here any more.
What, with all the posturing Starmer has done to appease the right-wing, he’s going to be a ‘beacon of hope for progressives’?
Pull the other one, it’s got bells on.
No shit. How have they not figured this out 15 years ago when every DVD had non-skippable anti-piracy messages?