It’s very hard to actually secure something someone has physical access to and that can be disassembled.
It’s very hard to actually secure something someone has physical access to and that can be disassembled.
Well, they can (and will) still scrape us if they want. Just nobody’s making a buck off of it.
That’s user level changes. You can still defed from the bridge. It actually makes this whole situation even more ridiculous. If you don’t agree with who your instance federates with you fucking leave.
Outsourcing administration instead of doing it in house would be much cheaper for news orgs in the long run I’d think. Volunteer admins is one thing. Staff admins is another.
Eh, stuff like truth social doesn’t federate with anything anyway, so unfortunately this isn’t a vulnerability for them.
extra-legal tactics like these which is essentially just blackmail
Politics?
I have yet to really wrap my head around the Commission, as a dumb American. It seems worse than our electoral college system, which is impressive.
That’s less entitlement and more “trying to create the community they envision”, though. It’s entitlement if they feel like they deserve users after fucking around. Mods, or really any online community leaders, can do whatever the fuck they want as far as I’m concerned.
The walled garden social networks have a serious downside compared to fediverse networks and that’s the registration wall. If you’re primarily publishing press releases and announcements, people will be unable to effectively share through links what you’re publishing. Mastodon let’s you bypass that while still allowing for the engagement that the other platforms do. And you don’t have to play pay to win with the algorithm to get your stuff to actually show up on feeds of the people already fucking following you.
I think the headline is quite wrong in regards to this press release, since it’s a new AI drug that is using a similar mechanism of action of an AI drug that was discovered in 2019. It’s strange because it says exactly that in their source.
Am nurse, the lines are all fucked up.
The microbloggers are a bit different than us, in that they actually try to create a “social circle.” Threaded discussions with random assholes like we enjoy tend to be more focused on giving us someone to reply to.
deleted by creator
It’s just meta promotion. I don’t know the specifics of their rules, but it’s the type of post I’d remove as a mod. I’d remove most meta posts.
I likely would’ve removed the thread for being offtopic, but not permanently banned you.
Sure, but there’s just not enough cabin space for what folks are trying to do now. Doesn’t help they redesigned the cabins to fit more seats.
He’s comparing it to back when folks would regularly check bags and not pack clothes in a carry on.
Actual banning but the federation making it weird is also a thing. Example would be us on Kbin. Folks can get banned from a community but if they’re on our instance they can still comment and it’ll still show up for us.
In the states, it’s actually usually integrated except for nursing homes(continuing care in this model) and to a lesser extent behavioral and addiction (though that’s often integrated with acute care). In many places a single metro organization (like hopkins, frederick health, and meritus in maryland) will have all the other legs.
Being spread out just makes it harder to administer when private because you don’t have the whole pipeline to control.
It’s actually even easier than that. Instead of setting up an tool to make up requests for the API, you can just set up a bridge that will dump everything right into your database. The wonders of federation.