I will check him out, thanks!

Agree. I mean I dunno if I’d be able to say no to $100 million even if I was already wealthy, so I don’t want to make it too black-and-white… But it definitely did harm, and I think it’s fair to describe it as selling out.

Who’s your favorite podcast? They sound rad.

Yeah, it’s much better for everyone except the rent-seeking company… And it isn’t even bad for the rent-seeker, they’re just deprived of the gains they would obtain from harming the ecosystem by fragmenting it.

If those Joe Rogan fans could read, they would be very upset right now!

EDIT: Oh you know what? I just fact-checked myself and apparently that podcast is no longer Spotify-exclusive as of very recently. I hope you enjoyed the joke anyway.

Piped: piped.video Invidious: yewtu.be

Those would be good places to start, if you still want YouTube content without the YouTube front-end.

You merely own a license that allows you to access Jason Momoa.

“…for NOW”

Let’s all agree right now that we’re not going to be a community that necro-shames.

EDIT: JUST TO BE CLEAR I MEAN MAKING PEOPLE FEEL BAD FOR POSTING IN OLD THREADS AND ONLY THAT ONE USAGE OF THE TERM

Good bot!

Came here to say that. It’s right there, guys.

Thanks for being no strangers to love, gang :)

I know you just got it, but do you think you’re ever gonna give it up?

It’s not a single issue, though-- It’s many:

• Inflation, especially cost of necessities (groceries, etc.)
• Buying property is well out of reach for many people
• Renting property is increasingly out of reach for many people
• Stagnant or declining job markets
• Interest rates and the cost of debt
• (To a lesser extent) Carbon taxes and cost of energy

And so on. Those problems are related in many ways, and well-summarized by the umbrella term “cost of living,” but I think it’s a mistake to think of it as a single issue… Both in general, and in the context of “single-issue elections.”

There might be other reasons, but here’s one good one:

It’d be really really hard to.

At 120m (the legal ceiling for “amateurs”), they’re barely even visible in the sky. At 500m (which even cheap drones can achieve), it might as well be invisible. Shooting it down would be next to impossible.

But I agree strongly with the sentiment.

LOL exquisitely executed 👌

Just gotta get a few things together and see how some stuff plays out but totally thinking about taking a good look at that soonish!

He said legal constraints may have prevented the committee from looking at contentious pesticides, raising questions about transparency.

Well I for one am comforted to know that we have a robust legal system in place to protect [checks notes] pesticide manufacturers from having their products… um… [thumbs through pages] evaluated for safety.