Literal genocide.

He was a person, so probably neither.

I’m not interested in debating his legacy. I’m interested in using this moment as a teachable lesson about what kind of person Putin is and what kind of state he runs.

First subdomain. I think HA is completely right that proxy with a subpath is basically an anti-pattern that just makes things worse for you and is always a bad idea (with very few exceptions).

It’s only an “anti pattern” because app developers are, on the whole, lazy bastards that start out hard coding stuff and then get discouraged at the amount of work needed to fix things after the fact.

I should know: I am one of these people.

It’s crap, it’s best to roll with the punches and use a sub domain.

Add ons are just shitty packaging of other software. Just run the other software directly.

I took a look at HAOS and declared it to be junk. I admire your optimism, but you should too.

It’s aimed at a no man’s land of people that run HA but don’t know how to manage their own docker. It’s just weird.

This is a measure of wealth not income. I’m guessing large land owners?

Good old article 2e of the convention.

There are two things at play here.

First, flight time is a thing. ICBM flight time is about half an orbital period. Launching from closer shortens that a lot. There are cases where this is important, but that’s not the likely issue here.

What I think is going on here is that we’re talking about relatively small bombs (as far as nuclear weapons go) launched or dropped from airplanes. There are similar setups all over central and southern Europe, for example at Aviano in Italy and Incirlik in Turkey. I’m not exactly certain what their propose is in current NATO doctrine, but in the Cold War they were intended to counter massed armor formations (ie. Tank assaults) from the eastern block. For that mission you need precise targeting of moving targets, which could not be done with 1970 era inertial guidance. Hence, planes.

A lot of things have happened in Europe over the past few years, and it’s not unreasonable to plan for scenarios where you have to fight off a tank assault on say Poland or Estonia. Why the UK instead of further east? Good question. It might be political expediency over tactical considerations.

Personally I think I’d be livid if I were the UK. Participating in US nuclear sharing arrangements makes a mockery of their already borderline credible independent deterrent. If you are a serious nuclear weapon state, you perform this mission with your own bombs on your own planes.

I definitely see it a lot. More than 69? That really depends on the context and crowd.

Wouldn’t that be back-backpedal? Or front pedal? Or just pedal?

If Hungary would be thrown out of the EU, it’d become a Russian puppet state like Belarus.

Good thing I neither typed nor intended to type anything like that.

I’m not suggesting anything close to “chopping off the arm”. Just politely tell the member at the door that he’s welcome to play squash all he wants, but only after he has settled the membership dues.

The contagion bit is a real risk, but I’m not sure it gets better if we don’t deal with the problem. If there are no consequences for breaking the rules, why should Hungary or any the other members follow them?

Just look at Brexit. There were mumblings all over the EU-27 about leaving the EU. After Brexit, after we showed them that yes, we would let them leave and that they would be totally screwed, it’s become a crackpot fringe position in the entire EU.

Actions must have consequences. This is the largest economic block on the planet. Play by the rules or go sit on the corner.

I’m not sure I follow your “on the other hand”.

The eu is a club, it has rules for members to follow. If you don’t follow the rules, you get your membership privileges suspended. How is this a difficult problem?

The right way to handle this is to stop being a bitch ass punching bag and make sure everyone holds up their end of the deal. If they want to be a totalitarian shithole they can do that on their own.

But the whole buy/sell of the hs2 land made some old fabulously wealthy land owners a lot of money, so I’m sure the Tories consider it a smashing success!

Bare repos with multiple users are a bit of a hassle because of file permissions. It works, and works well, as long as you set things up right and have clear processes. But god help you if you don’t.

I find that with multiple users the safest way is to set up/use a service. Plus you get a lot of extra features like issue tracking and stuff.

I definitely do not count it against them as long as they know how to human at the interview. I just review the code as I would any repo.

The only thing is that with regular projects I tend to go “I noticed on your GitHub you have project X that uses technology Y, etc etc”. With H projects I just go “do you have experience with Y” and let him choose how much he wants to share about the project. So far they remain vague on the non technical details and I let them leave with their dignity intact.

So, ranked, way ahead of candidates without visible projects, but slightly behind people with projects we can discuss in detail in front of the people from HR ;)

I love it when I check out am applicants’ GitHub and run into a bunch of repositories with mods for hentai games.

Win first, celebrate later.

No doubt to trade them for war criminals.

Everything I wrote is rigorously correct, if a bit tongue in cheek.

Go play with your Dunning Kruger somewhere else.