• ATGM 🚀@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, it even used to be law and not just culture, that consent was not required within marriages.

    It’s been a long and uphill struggle but this seems like an important step.

    I do find it frustrating that in these discussions, the assumption is often implicit that women are raped, and men are perpetrators. Which is extremely false and carries harms to men and boys who are victimized, or anyone including girls and women who are victimized by women. The MEP’s could stand to use more broad wording here I think.

    • ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My question is why is this only being spelled out now? Hell, where and why did the contrary idea come from in the first place??? ~Strawberry

      • ATGM 🚀@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think I understand what you mean. Are you asking about the origin of patriarchy and rape culture?

          • Kempeth@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A mix between people actually wanting spousal rape to remain legal, people not giving a fuck about feeemale issues, people getting scared that “they can’t even talk to women soon without getting arrested” and probably a few other reasons that range from dumb to malicious.