• hh93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another circlejerk article for Europe with a hypothetical scenario as an opinion piece just to get people angry. Seems weird that something like this is coming from Reuters - I thought they did mostly matter of fact reporting for things that happened and not stuff like this

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an article with listed facts, graphs, and data you fucking dullard, just read the damn article.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It says “Commentary” right on top. That means it is a comment and not an analysis. So maybe just read the damn commentary, before starting to insult people.

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wtf difference does that make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.

            So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.