cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10958052

Vanguard, the controversial anti-cheat software initially attached to Valorant, is now also coming to League of Legends.

Summary:

The article discusses Riot Games’ requirement for players to install their Vanguard anti-cheat software, which runs at the kernel level, in order to play their games such as League of Legends and Valorant. The software aims to combat cheating by scanning for known vulnerabilities and blocking them, as well as monitoring for suspicious activity while the game is being played. However, the use of kernel-level software raises concerns about privacy and security, as it grants the company complete access to users’ devices.

The article highlights that Riot Games is owned by Tencent, a Chinese tech giant that has been involved in censorship and surveillance activities in China. This raises concerns that Vanguard could potentially be used for similar purposes, such as monitoring players’ activity and restricting free speech in-game.

Ultimately, the decision to install Vanguard rests with players, but the article urges caution and encourages players to consider the potential risks and implications before doing so.

    • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong but if it can’t run Valorant then it can’t run the game in general, so you’d be just as well off by not playing Riot games on a Windoze or Mac machine as well.

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m ok with running a VM to run software if I absolutely have to but this won’t even let you do that.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not supporting a game is not a reason to switch to linux, and the more games aren’t supported, the less people are gonna switch. The Linux zeal on this site is comical.

      “Haha my OS cant play games that have millions of concurrent daily users each!”

      How the year of the Linux gaming PC coming?

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s the other way around: no game is worth sacrificing security and privacy by giving it kernel level access.

        The argument is: more and more games are running on Linux and there’s a damn good reason not to play the ones that don’t at all.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s a great argument for the extremely small percentage of gamers who give a damn about that, but just about all of them are already on linux, so if that’s the way forward for linux gaming, congrats it’s at full saturation. This site is wild. Downvotes for pointing out thay not running games thay millions play a day is bad for gaming on the OS. I may as well be talking to Republicans about Biden. You’re zealots.

          Go on the legaue and valorant forums see how many of the millions you can convince that Linux security is more important than being able to play with their friends.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lol bold opinion on this site when people are already responding that its good for Linux gaming that it won’t play games that has intrusive anticheat. I’ll admit sure it’s better for security, but to think that’s a good thing for gaming on Linux is hilarious.

              • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                No, it’s obviously better to have the choice (run the game or not). And losing a game that previously worked on Linux is obviously a bad thing, hence the joke about it being good.

                Of course you could argue that taking a stance against this kind of intrusive anticheat is good in the long run. If Microsoft had a backbone they’d do the same.

                But yeah losing games because of anticheat is obviously a bad thing lol. No need to take it so seriously.

                • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The comment was about valorant, did that one ever work on Linux, if so I wasn’t aware that they figured it out. Didnt seem like a joke, and people are unironocally agreeing with it soooo

          • Gabu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t give a shit if a billion people suddenly decide that shooting their own brains is a great idea, shooting yourself is still a bad idea.

          • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Just so you understand, you aren’t downvoted because you have a different opinion. You are downvoted because the conversation is basically this:

            Post: Company does evil and shit things!

            You: Well the majority lets them so I will too and so should you.

            Others: We should not let company do evil.

            You: Haha but majority lets them so I will too and you should too!

            See how stupid it is?

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Im literally just asking for people to not act like that’s a good thing. Also your example is exactly how ALL companies work, tell me do you avoid every product Nestle makes? If by some miracle you do, there’s at least a dozen other mega companies I imagine you can’t. I don’t understand how you call that stupid considering I’d wager a lot of money you participate in systems EXACTLY like that.

              • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                tell me do you avoid every product Nestle makes?

                Yes, actually. If you don’t buy processed foods it’s very easy.

                there’s at least a dozen other mega companies I imagine you can’t.

                Try me.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            So, requiring to puncture the security and privacy of your PC for a game is ok, as long as millions of players are affected. Did I understand you correctly, here?

            • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              The same people would let Sony install a rootkit so they can listen to music on their PC.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Nowhere did I say that, what I said is most gamers do not care. So what I’m implying is if you want Linux desktop OS to overtake the next highest competitor (which is ‘OS unknown’ btw) you’re going to need to do better. For at least the past 20 years gaming has been a social phenomena more than anything else, and not being able to play games that millions play daily isn’t a brag for linux gaming just because you’re more secure than they are. Unknown OS is ahead of linux on desktop share, not just gaming desktop, all desktop. Linux ranks just below a statistical anomaly and just above chrome os. If that’s fine with you than fine, but if you’re one of the people for whom gaming is a very social thing, then you’re probably never moving to linux at this rate, or at least hope things get better. But apparently I’m the only one unsatisfied with what gaming on linux looks like, and everyone else loves it as is. Welp, if that’s how it is and this is what linux gaming is supposed to be, then it’s defiantly not for me either.

      • Montagge@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        How the year of the Linux gaming PC coming?

        Pretty damn good! I can play all of my games that I want!

      • Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It may sound silly, but for a lot of people being unable to play games like Valorant, Warzone or League of Legends it’s actually a feature and not a bug or a problem.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Pro tip, you can not install those games on literally every OS, so even if that’s a feature for you, its one you absolutely do not need linux for.

          “Thats the best part of my ti 89 calculator. It doesn’t play Lol Cod or Valorant!”

          What a brilliant feature, that calculator was ahead of its time.

      • jinarched@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        OP was saying something along the lines of ‘if Valorant can’t run on Linux, it’s a sign your privacy is much less compromised.’ After all this community is specifically about privacy.

      • Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ima tell you right now 90% probably more of the val community wouldnt play the game on linux or switch regardless of if it ran or not so it so it doesnt really matter

      • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        How the year of the Linux gaming PC coming?

        You’re right, it’s been absolutely devastating not being able to play games on my computer. I’ll go cry over my video game consoles.

          • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re right, it’s been absolutely devastating not being able to play a 14-year old game that I have no interest in playing on my computer. I’ll go cry over my video game consoles.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    Meh just another crappy rootkit game that doesn’t even fully prevent cheating at the cost of undermining system security. But for worse or worse, the entire playerbase doesn’t care about their data being bought and sold for immense profits they get 0% of.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’ve never played League of Legends because they just now introduced kernal level anti cheat? That doesn’t even make sense.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Don’t play at first, because the game fosters toxicity like hell. Keep not playing due to the kernel-level anticheat.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      since the cheat works great.

      I’ve heard that cheaters are very rampent in Valorant, so not really effective anti cheat software.

        • macniel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          yeah… and I’m a bit sad, since I really think that Valorant is fun (with friends), but it’s a price I’m willing to pay.

      • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You know, Valve once considered making an entire OS to prevent cheating. I’d assume something like SteamOS, but incredibly locked down and designed for playing Valve games. Obviously that never got past the idea stage, but disregarding the truckload of issues with that idea, one big one is that you could use either physical cheating tools, by messing with the direct hardware inputs, or run it in a VM. Basically, unless you have a player in a locked-off room, with a pc, keyboard, and mouse provided by you, and the pc running your own locked-down OS… well, someone’s gonna figure out a way to cheat.

        That’s not to say that anticheat can be ignored entirely, but since there is no remotely reasonable state which could eradicate cheating entirely, you need to find a happy medium of not “infecting” the player’s pc with a new backdoor, because even if you’re not malicious, someone else will be, and nothing at all. Something that has a minimum level of invasiveness with a maximum level of cheating prevention, at least filtering out basic script kiddies.

        The problem with that is, nobody cares. Basically nobody even knows what a “Kernel” is and what “Kernel-level” means and implies, so it’s just some weird anticheat for them. Also, as long as DRM doesn’t interfere with their playing experience, they don’t care either. Barely anyone will even notice if a few frames are missing, because Denuvo is chilling in the background, keeping the game “safe”.

        We are a subset of privacy-minded people in a subset of somewhat knowledgeable gamers. Losing us as customers doesn’t matter in the slightest to the devs/publishers, and nobody else will make a fuss, or at least they’ll not stop spending money.

        • macniel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The problem with that is, nobody cares. Basically nobody even knows what a “Kernel” is and what “Kernel-level” means and implies, so it’s just some weird anticheat for them. Also, as long as DRM doesn’t interfere with their playing experience, they don’t care either. Barely anyone will even notice if a few frames are missing, because Denuvo is chilling in the background, keeping the game “safe”.

          We are a subset of privacy-minded people in a subset of somewhat knowledgeable gamers. Losing us as customers doesn’t matter in the slightest to the devs/publishers, and nobody else will make a fuss, or at least they’ll not stop spending money.

          Yeah, computer illiteracy is pretty bad. Those who don’t care make the most money to companies, and they don’t even care how the companies invade their privacy and or security.

      • Jako301@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The first crack took around 4 days.

        The only difference us that cheats now cost more money than before.

  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Riot Games Now Requires Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat Software

    In other words, a Chinese rootkit. Wouldn’t want a Chinese backdoor in my kernel, but that’s just my personal opinion. If you want one, go ahead, install this garbage.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t support this existing, but does the nsa collect and sell all your data to third parties and make a shitload of money doing so? Because everyone else definitely does. I don’t know how difficult it is now, but some number of years ago you could request a copy of all the data some of the social media sites have on you and it’s fucking scary especially with how much is deduced, presumably from piecing together info from your entire social network.

        • Jako301@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’d much rather have the USA as a world leader, but considering that neither if them are anywhere near that level of control, giving my data to China is the better option.

          If the US has my data and the worst case happens, i.e. anything in my data labels me as a terrorist (let’s be honest, nothing else matters to the NSA, they don’t care about your day to day life), then the possibility is high that my own government gets a hint and I’m locked up pretty quickly.

          If China has my data the worst case is that I can’t set foot into China, that’s it.

          Both options are shit, but having their data in China means less possible harm for anyone that isn’t a Chinese or Russian citizen.

        • version_unsorted@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well, the world today kind of sucks and continues to decline and the US plays global police force which no one asked for.

  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    My biggest issue wouldn’t even be the kernel level access, but the fact that the stuff is written and tested by no one in particular. The possible bugs are the issue for me.

    If that thing would be bullet-proof, hackers trying for years to break it without success, yeah. Ok. I could be convinced. If it is cracked after two days already… Then nope.

    • DeafeningDistance@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s likely, but I do really hope it’s not put into the MMO as I would love to play a Riot MMO. I won’t be installing it if it uses Vanguard.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Same. I miss the IP (especially Arcane) & the friends I made playing LoL—and I think I could have a good time living in the world, but not at the cost of compromising device permissions. Same reason I refuse to use my shitty banking app if they try to tell me what software I can & can’t run/install or how to operate the device I own.

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    This has been known for years and it’s not different from the behavior of EAC, whether it’s good or bad.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Except that EAC doesn’t have to run from startup and can be started on demand. Vanguard has to run all the time.

      But yeah, Vanguards shitty behavior is known since its inception.

      • KarthNemesis@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        10 months ago

        This. An always-on rootkit is worlds different in terms of privacy and security than most conventional ones like EAC.
        (Not like conventional ACs are good for these things either, of course. But it is many degrees less invasive.)