Danielle Smith has long claimed to be a friend of the LGBTQ community. Her government's raft of new policies on trans issues suggest otherwise and raise an important question: Who wouldn't she betray to stay on Take Back Alberta's good side?
Fiscal conservatism, in the strictest sense, has always been a means of conserving the favored hierarchies. We don’t fund social programs, and as a result we maintain the rich/poor dynamic for example. This definition has nothing to do with prudent effective spending, I think.
What we think of as traditional Canadian fiscal conservatism is more correctly prudent fiscal liberalism. A willingness to engage in the use of fiscally measures for social gain so long as the funding is effective.
It’s a shame that fiscal conservatism has somehow become synonymous with wanting to spend money wisely.
What we think of as traditional Canadian fiscal conservatism is more correctly prudent fiscal liberalism.
Oh 100%: Justin Trudeau’s policies are either taken directly from the Con party (Carbon Tax credits, etc), or are directly in line with their values. The Con party has voted in favour/alongside the Liberal party in something like 95% of all votes taken since Trudeau came to power.
They just don’t like him. That’s fine, I don’t either. The issue is that, also as you’ve stated, they keep inventing this idea that ‘fiscal conservatism’ A) has worked in the past, and B) will work now. They shuffle past the fact that when they were at their best they were Neoliberals.
Fiscal conservatism, in the strictest sense, has always been a means of conserving the favored hierarchies. We don’t fund social programs, and as a result we maintain the rich/poor dynamic for example. This definition has nothing to do with prudent effective spending, I think.
What we think of as traditional Canadian fiscal conservatism is more correctly prudent fiscal liberalism. A willingness to engage in the use of fiscally measures for social gain so long as the funding is effective.
It’s a shame that fiscal conservatism has somehow become synonymous with wanting to spend money wisely.
Oh 100%: Justin Trudeau’s policies are either taken directly from the Con party (Carbon Tax credits, etc), or are directly in line with their values. The Con party has voted in favour/alongside the Liberal party in something like 95% of all votes taken since Trudeau came to power.
They just don’t like him. That’s fine, I don’t either. The issue is that, also as you’ve stated, they keep inventing this idea that ‘fiscal conservatism’ A) has worked in the past, and B) will work now. They shuffle past the fact that when they were at their best they were Neoliberals.
Oh, you don’t have to convince me of their objectives. They just used to be less… upfront about it, not so long ago.