☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-28 months agoCOVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individualswww.sciencedirect.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down14
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkCOVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individualswww.sciencedirect.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Science@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-28 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agotl;dr: our study confirmed previously identified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination
minus-squarealeph@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoAnd the side effects are rare and statistically pose less risk than being unvaccinated and contracting the actual virus. How is this news?
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoit’s important to check up on previously made estimations and see how well they hold up. Might result in “oh shit, we missed something important” or “good to know we were right, now we have an even better foundation for the next studies”
minus-squarealeph@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoOh absolutely, but as a news item it’s a little uneventful. On the other hand, I suppose it’s good to know that the scientific process is still there, ticking away in the background.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoReally it’s just confirmation of what we were pretty sure of all along. That won’t stop people from lying about it, of course.
tl;dr:
And the side effects are rare and statistically pose less risk than being unvaccinated and contracting the actual virus.
How is this news?
it’s important to check up on previously made estimations and see how well they hold up.
Might result in “oh shit, we missed something important” or “good to know we were right, now we have an even better foundation for the next studies”
Oh absolutely, but as a news item it’s a little uneventful.
On the other hand, I suppose it’s good to know that the scientific process is still there, ticking away in the background.
Really it’s just confirmation of what we were pretty sure of all along.
That won’t stop people from lying about it, of course.