How are non-ccTLDs, like .com any safer? A fascist like Trump could decide to nationalize managing them at any time

Well, since !fuckcars@lemmy.ml doesn’t exist, I prefer the one that does.

Usually, if there are multiple communities one is significantly more active than the others. For cats, check out these three

• !cats@lemmy.ml
• !cats@lemmy.world
• !cats@sh.itjust.works

Only the last one is what I’d deem active.

Think of it like email (lists). There can be a !fuckcars@lemmy.world and a !fuckcars@lemmy.ml (the latter doesn’t exist, but it could)

You can access both communities, subscribe to both and post to both. Their content is (mostly) identical, the only difference is who’s hosting it.

There is no central authority determining the rules. For instance, Reddit can ban whatever they like and allow whatever they like. That’s not how it works here. The only rules are what each community decides are their own rules. Certain communities, such as !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com no longer exist in some sort of tolerated limbo, unlike on Reddit where they could be shut down at a moment’s notice.

What? I barely understand what you’re saying.

Regulating industries is not banning them. And industries profiting from addictions should be especially regulated to prevent and combat said addictions. Is banning gambling ads targeted at children also fascist?

That’s false, these warnings are successful ib preventing people from consuming the drug and therefore directly decreasing healthcare costs for society.

In fact, some countries pursue it even further, mandating bland packaging for cigarettes. This is especially effective in preventing minors from smoking.