• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    FYI, he wasn’t taking photos, he was standing idly and was blocking a public sidewalk with his equipment while he waited for a good shot. He claimed that he was out of the way, but that particular sidewalk doesn’t allow for any room to be “out of the way” because it has a street on one side and a wall on the other.

    Granted, he had a massive tripod and a pro camera right outside the US consulate building for at least a half hour, which is why the police were called. He had been asked to move along, and he just argued, so he got a ticket.

    A pro photographer, with intention to shoot commercial photography in a public place, might have applied for a permit first. Especially if the shoot required blocking public walkways for such a long time.

    He can certainly challenge this in court, but to what end? He seemed to be clearly in the wrong.

      • Smk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s the matter ? You can’t read too many word ?? He is explaining his opinion dude. Relax. If this gets to court we will see what the outcome is. Both opinion are validm blocking the sidewalk is bad but I can see why someone would want to take time to take a good shot of chateau Frontenac.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that putting him in handcuffs and ticketing him seems extreme, as a warning could have been enough.

        He is still in the wrong, regardless.