Citing UN sources, the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs says that the “wholly inadequate humanitarian access over the last 4 months” means that the population faces acute food insecurity, with a serious risk of famine developing. “This is unconscionable,” the statement says.

“Freezing or withdrawing funding to UNRWA further exacerbates these risks - States which have done so must urgently rescind this decision and resume funding.”

  • NoLifeKing@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wanna go cry somewhere else? I’ve never said something like that i said that all terrorists need to be eliminated in order to get peace.

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nooe, right here seems fine. No but you basically said they need to be eradicated, please tell me his that’s different. And you could also elaborate on how you would combat the terrorists if you had it your way.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      all of this will repeat over and over until Hamas gets completely wiped out

      you, literally in the same comment chain

      • NoLifeKing@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes that’s what i said, with the given context. You cant just cherrypick half a sentence.

        • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Should I just quote the rest of that comment then? Because you repeat yourself in the next paragraph, you’re even so kind to put a full stop behind the statement that time:

          The only solution is the removal of every single Hamas person and at best the Irani government as well, Hamas is just their sock puppet.

          Tell me, where is this mysterious “context” you mention because I just can’t seem to find it between your constant demand/proposal to eradicate all terrorists.

          • NoLifeKing@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            With context: kill all Hamas terrorists that constantly break any ceasefire and remove their backbone called the Irani government.

            Without context: kill everyone

            Big fucking difference dude.

            • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Context:

              • Israel is killing civilians, including children, while attempting to eradicate Hamas
              • Calls for a ceasefire happen so Israel stops killing innocents
              • “muh ceasefire don’t work, you need to eradicate Hamas first”

              Now tell me, where in that comment chain do you, explicitly, state that no civilians should be killed in the attempt to remove Hamas from Gaza?

              You cannot remove Hamas by means of force without at the same time killing an incredibly large number of innocent civilians. You demanding Hamas has to be eradicated first is, implicitly, stating that you are A-OK with Israel slaughtering innocents in the process.

              As you say they are a terrorist organization, they use human shields. You cannot state your argument in some fantasy reality where Hamas and the IDF suddenly play by the rules of engagement.