• Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s certainly not overblown, feel free to look up the asbestos required to cause chronic health effects. It’s not some mystery, the numbers are out there, no wild speculation needed.

    This is such a hilarious yet literally deadly problem, it’s like anti vaxxers who see “nobody has died of smallpox in years!” And forego smallpox vaccinations for their children.

    Except this time instead of various life threatening pathogens, it’s friable mechanically toxic cancer darts.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re clearly not a geologist. Asbestos refers to a whole group of minerals that have fibrous habits. There are many perfectly safe forms of asbestos that have repeated, common, and constant modern occupational exposure without issues. Serpentinite being the most common found on minesites.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s a deflection. They are all known carcinogens lol, and doesn’t meaningfully change the point.

        And no im not a geologist, but I’ve done hazard analysis on work with asbestos. I’m curious what you think a geologist has to actually say about the medical hazard of asbestos.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m curious what you think a geologist has to actually say about the medical hazard of asbestos

          Wait! I’m asking my doctor about this leaky pipe under my sink.

          But I love the absurdity you pointed out.