From the article:

When we went to our seats, the wait staff let us know that despite the fact that the previews were playing, we wouldn’t know until the movie actually started whether we could see the film or not. If it didn’t work, the screen would just turn black. Luckily, the film went through without a hitch.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    1st Jan? Smells like an expired certificate somewhere in whatever chain of DRM bullshit they use.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        ·
        1 year ago

        Made even worse by Sony, the manufacturer, completely exiting that market. I wonder if/how Sony will fix this, are there even staff on hand there with the technical details for their projector’s DRM anymore?

        It speaks volumes about how silly DRM is when a massive game publisher like TakeTwo/Rockstar resorts to selling a pirated version of their own game 🤦‍♂️

        The next time this happens those projectors may end up being $20000 bricks, and I’m not too sure how many independents will be able to afford dumping a quarter of a million to replace all their projector screens

        • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          55
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not too sure how many independents will be able to afford dumping a quarter of a million to replace all their projector screens

          Don’t worry, thanks to this amazing thing called capitalism a big chain will happily buy out those struggling independents at a fraction of their actual worth.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    watch a literal half hour of ads and then maybe, if you’re very lucky, you get to watch the movie you paid for.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pay attention boys and girls, this is also what they want to do with over the air broadcasts with the ATSC 3.0 format.

    • YoorWeb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Remember that time when they’ve added rootkits to over 20 millions of audio cd’s? You’ve guessed it, the installation was automatic, hidden and their software had vulnerabilities.

      One of the programs would install and “phone home” with reports on the user’s private listening habits, even if the user refused its end-user license agreement (EULA), while the other was not mentioned in the EULA at all. Both programs contained code from several pieces of copylefted free software in an apparent infringement of copyright.

      • hideo@lemmyhub.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        DRM but over the air, consumers hate it, investors love it, it’ll make everything worse, it’s the future!

        • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do investors really love it? Is there anyone as stupid as the group-think whole that believes that will stop even one act of piracy?

          All these idiotic measures have clearly driven more people to piracy…

          • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            I doubt the investors are smart enough to understand the technology behind it. All they probably hear and fully understand is the part where they can potentially make more money in the long run.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Money people are literally too stupid to understand anything other than line go up or line go down. They were told line would go up if DRM, so that’s what they want.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        1 year ago

        So broadcast TV currently broadcasts on ATSC 1.0. You get an antenna and a box or TV that has a digital tuner and you’re good. Industry is pushing for ATSC 3.0, which allows for DRM. So even though they are broadcasting on the public airwaves, they can decide you can’t watch. It sets up the local broadcasters to be the new cable with ever increasing prices AND play king maker on devices by choosing which can and cannot produce tuners. In my area, 5 channels have ATSC 3.0, and 1 of them turned on DRM. Meaning I can’t watch it because HDHomeRun devices aren’t approved, likely because it has the ability to record. Luckily, that channel still broadcasts in ATSC 1.0, so I can still watch it for now. 3.0 isn’t a fully adopted yet, but that can change in the future (2027?).

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So at some point, it’ll be impossible to get emergency broadcast alerts without a subscription to something, right? Like who’s gonna turn on a TV or radio that they can’t use in anticipation of some emergency they can’t predict?

            • shrugal@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry, but I think that’s a little far fetched.

              Are you really suggesting that we run the risk of being too disconnected to receive emergency messages?! In an age where everyone has a smartphone on their person at all times, as well as at least a dozen internet-connected devices in their homes, offices, classrooms etc?!

              You would’ve had a point maybe 20 years ago, but technology has changed a bit since then.

                • shrugal@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not, because the statement is much more accurate in the case of internet-connected devices, and for emergency messages it’s enough to have someone around you who has one (e.g. a neighbour). I guess it would be really hard to find someone - in the areas where this change is made - who doesn’t have access to such a device in that sense, maybe even impossible.

                  It’s really more like assuming everyone breathes air because most people do.

              • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah this was nonsense. Like it is mandated to have a TV always on to receive such emergency broadcasts. Same thing can happen to someone not having or not using a TV

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 year ago

    The way we murder DRM is by it affecting the business bottom line.

    This might be an offense worthy of litigation if Sony is not sufficiently contrite.

    It’s telling how unfriendly the DRM is, that it doesn’t inform the protectionist of problems until the minute the show starts.

    Sony is a real dick.

    • SapphironZA@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      DRM only affects paying customers. It plays no role in effectively combatting piracy.

      Only good service and good pricing is effective against piracy.

      • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I completely agree with you based on the data, DRM is absolutely sold to publishers on the pretense that it combats piracy, at least with keeping paying customers from engaging with media in ways the publishers don’t like (such as lending content or selling that content used in a secondary market).

        And yes, the more draconian their restrictions, the more they drive people to resources that provide cracked or DRM-free content. That said, Sony is notorious for going to extreme lengths to severely limit use of their content outside narrow consumption, often with obligatory ad-viewing, driving people to either piracy, or avoiding Sony content at all.

        At one point, I might have been interested in playing Horizon Zero Dawn and went from buying it, to getting a refund to thinking about pirating it to eventually deciding I cannot be bothered. But then I steer clear of most AAA game companies, now.

      • Exulion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean unfortunately denuvo has been pretty effective lately. It’s not uncrackable but not a lot of effort is being put into it other than when Empress feels like it.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve built DCPs (Digital Cinema Package, the format that protectors use) and the DRM part is always so finicky. I’m surprised this doesn’t happen more often.

      • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never worked on this stuff but I’ve looked it up before. Essentially, theatres get a DCP but it’s unplayable without a Key Delivery Message (KDM).

        My understanding is that theatres order these and pay a fee for each one. The KDM is only valid to unlock a specific DCP, on a specific projector, on a specific date and time. It won’t work if any of these checks are off meaning you can’t check that it works until the theatre is filled with patrons who paid to see your movie, as the KDM will only decrypt the movie seconds before playtime. If there’s some glitch, a theatre manager needs to call a hotline for a new KDM.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s been over 10 years since I worked in a movie theater but this is the gist:

        Hard Drives with the film are derived via FedEx and the films are encrypted with symmetric AES keys which are emailed to our theater. These keys allow us to play back the film for a window of time. Sometimes we’re sent keys to unlock different times if a film gets an extended release.

        Some studios (Disney being the worst) would send you keys late into the evening, requiring staff to stay late to test for the following day. Sometimes they’d send us the wrong keys and it would take a long time to get the correct keys emailed to us.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If only there was a technology that allowed theaters to play movies in an analogue manner that they were in 100% control of. That would be cool. Why hasn’t that ever been invented?

      • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the fact that your access can vanish for no reason at any time.

        Also… internet crash. That’s going to be fun for folks.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        im looking at a future that no longer has any working film production equipment because nobody makes parts for such things

        • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Somebody’s collecting all those old projectors and celluloid and that person is going to be the coolest person in whatever city they are in depending on the celluloid they also collect.

          In fact — in Portland — a big assed projector would go over huge even today.

          I think people are sick to death of the magic of digital streaming.

      • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes — but local projectionists maintain the ability to restore the ability to present the films.

        When corporations are in charge of everything, humanity is a powerless minion holding its icky tiny gruel filled bowl and whining, “please, sir, May I have some more.”

  • vsis@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    I also assume it’s an expired certificate.

    See, this is what happens when certificates are not renewed automatically.

    The article says the projectos are discontinued. That’s probably the reason no one is monitoring these certs.

    Another glorious benefit of DRM.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Sony is having trouble with their projectors”

    Why not call it out for the bullshit that it is? “Sorry, but greedy bullshit capitalism has failed you as a customer. The lockouts they’ve put on their media to punish the honest users is doing its job once again to punish you. We sure hope this doesn’t lead you to find alternative ways to enjoy media without all of the DRM lockouts and garbage to punish you.”